home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!pipeline!not-for-mail
- From: leelord@nyc.pipeline.com (Lee Lord)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,
- Subject: Re: SupraFAX 28.8 vs SupraExpress 28.8
- Date: 5 Apr 1996 01:43:27 -0500
- Organization: The Pipeline
- Message-ID: <4k2fef$ers@pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com>
- References: <eric-0204961819050001@sobt.ao.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com
- X-PipeUser: leelord
- X-PipeHub: nyc.pipeline.com
- X-PipeGCOS: (Lee Lord)
- X-Newsreader: Pipeline v3.5.0
-
- On Apr 02, 1996 18:19:04 in article <Re: SupraFAX 28.8 vs SupraExpress
- 28.8>, 'eric@ao.net (Eric Shaw)' wrote:
-
-
- >In article <4jqnqv$bqv@pipe3.nyc.pipeline.com>, leelord@nyc.pipeline.com
- (Lee
- >Lord) wrote:
- >
- >> The Supra Express is a rpi modem which does *not* have a Flash Rom.
- >>Therefore you can not upgrade it by downloading software. Besides that,
- >>I've seen many negative posts in differenct newsgroups concerning not
- only
- >>Supra, but other rpi modems.
- >
- >Where does this idea come from? It has many downsides, like no NVRAM and
- no
- >Flash ROM, but it is NOT RPI.
-
-
-
-
- So sorry, I stand corrected... the Supra Express is NOT a RPI Modem. Thank
- you for correcting me. I thought that I had seen or read, when I was
- thinking of buying a SupraFax 28.8i, that the SupraExpress was a RPI.
-
- BTW, I did buy that 28.8i and think that it's great! Have had it about 6
- months now.
-
- Lee
-
-
-
- Lee Lord
-
- Lee Lord
-